No one should feel guilty about any crime they didn't personally commit, but whenever I read a post and a thread like this one regarding white guilt, I wonder whether such people are equally as fervent about distancing themselves from the laudable actions and legacies of our Founding Fathers--or that of the World War Two Generation--as they are about disassociating themselves from the country's distant slave-holding past and not-so-distant oppressive past (45 years ago).
If our good history is relevant to who we, as Americans, are today, then so is our bad history and there's nothing wrong with thinking about and acknowledging the truth about both. Our foundation is composed of both. However, it does not, or rather, it need not follow that blame be cast or guilt be felt as a result of admitting the truth. Think first; feel second, if at all.
Just saying.
Not being perfect, America and Americans have not and do not always reach the bar which we had set for us in the late eighteenth century. However, we should feel proud--not guilty--that our Founding Fathers gave us such a high bar to reach for in the first place. When we fall short we get up and try again. That's our heritage and to have the country wallow in both guilt and blame gives all of us an excuse not to get up.
PRETEND AS THOUGH THERE'S A SEGUE HERE: Christian doctrine maintains that we're all guilty of sin and deserve death and that Jesus Christ died for our crimes. But the doctrine of Black Liberation Theology changes the essential nature of Jesus Christ, holds white persons still culpable for their perceived sins and those of their fathers and--the most important part--ignores Jesus's purpose for being born, being crucified and being resurrected.
The founder of BLT and those who have been taking in by him want to hold onto the power of guilt over white Americans, but can't be brave enough to repudiate Jesus Christ as he actually is. His mercy is inconvenient. So they change him into someone else, a victim who requires earthly vengeance. It's a change--a lie--they can believe in.
Even though the Obamas have left TUCC, they have not refuted their belief in this religion of guilt and blame, this Black Liberation Theology. As a matter of fact Michelle is still selling guilt, white and otherwise, while her mate offers the sufferers of white-guilt the promise of redemption if only they would believe in him.
Do not forget that this is who these folks are.
I suspect that at least one of my maternal great grandfathers, being a small farmer in Missouri and having bought the farm before the Civil War, was a slave owner. It must not have been too onerous for them because right up to 1920 they were sending their kids to work for his kids "to learn white folks ways".
I know I grew up (in California) with a certain amount of prejudice in almost totally white surroundings. However, I was in the Army during the first of desegregation and was quite happy for it and have since been a member of churches that have been at least partially integrated.
I don't feel that I bear "white guilt" but I would dearly love to vote and have a black president if I could only agree with his (firmly held) principles.
Would that Thomas Sowell could be persuaded to run, but I guess he has entirely too much good sense!
Posted by: Bill Brown | July 22, 2008 at 12:39 PM
"As a matter of fact Michelle is still selling guilt, white and otherwise, while her mate offers the sufferers of white-guilt the promise of redemption if only they would believe in him."
Pretty nifty con game, isn't it?
Posted by: Donna B. | July 22, 2008 at 02:55 PM
They are the people who they have been waiting for.
.
Personally, I will wait for the one true Messiah, who is the color of Love.
Amen
Posted by: abinitioadinfinitum | July 22, 2008 at 02:58 PM